Famous Glatt V Fox Searchlight Pictures Ideas. Fox searchlight pictures, inc., 811 f.3d 528 (2d cir. Footman, a recent college graduate, worked in the production department.
The second circuit held, on a question of first impression, that whether interns qualify as “employees” under the flsa depends on whether they or the company that hired them is the “primary beneficiary” of their relationship. Case opinion for us 2nd circuit glatt v. Read the court's full decision on findlaw.
Contents
- 1 2013) Case Opinion From The Southern District Of New York U.s.
- 2 Fox Searchlight Pictures 2013 U.s.
- 3 Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc., No.
- 4 Docket Activity Of Federal Case Glatt V.
- 5 2016), United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit, Case Facts, Key Issues, And Holdings And Reasonings Online Today.
2013) Case Opinion From The Southern District Of New York U.s.
Footman, a recent college graduate, worked in the production department. Fox searchlight pictures, inc., 811 f.3d 528, 535 (2d cir. Of the tests that appellate courts utilize to assess whether an unpaid intern qualifies as an employee, the primary beneficiary test that the second circuit promulgates in glatt v.
Fox Searchlight Pictures 2013 U.s.
Two appeals were argued in tandem on this issue with the second circuit issuing an opinion on july 2, 2015 in glatt v. Coverage of federal case glatt v. Read the court's full decision on findlaw.
Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc., No.
Usca, second circuit july 2, 2015. Glatt and footman's motion for summary judgment that they are employees covered by the flsa and nyll and that searchlight is their joint employer is granted. Lexis 82079 (s.d.n.y.) opinion by district judge pauley:
Docket Activity Of Federal Case Glatt V.
Plaintiffs eric glatt, alexander footman, [and other named plaintiffs] bring this putative class action under the fair labor standards act (“flsa”) [and state laws] against defendants fox searchlight pictures inc. Antalik, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, plaintiffs. Best addresses the question because it follows supreme court precedent and focuses on the educational benefit interns receive.
2016), United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit, Case Facts, Key Issues, And Holdings And Reasonings Online Today.
Fox searchlight pictures, inc., and a summary order in wang v. Defendants moved to certify the court’s opinion and order f or immediate appeal, which the district court granted. Judge pauley went on to say that these putative interns: